Saturday, December 7, 2013

First Impressions of Japan

Today is Saturday, December 7, 2013.

Before I went to Japan to live, I visited there with my Japanese husband for about six weeks in the summer of 1975.  I remember being unprepared for the heat and humidity, and being grateful to get into an air-conditioned train.  I remembered seeing a big billboard ad for Kirin Beer and thinking that a nice, cold beer would be very welcome.

The humidity wasn't the only shock; the view outside the train window was a shock, too.  Most people associate Japan with beautiful images of stately Mount Fuji, clouds of pink cherry blossoms, austere rooms with rush-matted floors and little furniture, stunning gardens, ancient temples, and shrines, and beautiful, kimono-clad women posing with delicate paper parasols. I sure did.  And I saw all of that, but not at first.  What I learned is that if you want those beautiful views of Japan, you have to know where to look. 

If you take the train, however, be prepared for ugly.  Most modern buildings and homes in Japan are of concrete construction, the vast majority with plain stucco exteriors in drab earth tones.  Of course, I first saw this well before Americans started painting their homes in earth tones.  My first visit to Japan was back in the mid-seventies, when homes in the United States were either bright white or vivid colors.  

Concrete isn't a bad choice, especially for areas with high humidity.  (I've realized since the time I first visited Japan that concrete is the material of choice for a lot of places in humid areas.)  The humidity isn't the only reason for the concrete, though.  Remember that Japan is very earthquake-prone.  As well, the Japanese have learned from hard experience that their traditional wooden buildings were always at the mercy of fires, and since Japanese people still heat their homes one room at a time with small gas or electric stoves, the danger of fire is very real.  I don't know if they still do this today, but back then, there was always someone in every neighborhood who walked around the streets with wooden blocks or sticks, making a clapping sound with the wood, and calling out to their neighbors to be sure to put out their fires before going to bed.

Homes tend to be narrow, with very little yard space around them, if any at all.  The vast majority of homes are surrounded by a fence, often a very high one, for privacy.  Homes are built right up against streets and railroad tracks, and it seemed as if I could just lean out the train window and touch the houses.   In some areas there were few buildings over two stories high, but of course in the cities, more and more buildings are taller.  Few buildings are more than about 5 to 8 stories in height, however. 

There were a lot of telephone lines, and I realized with a start that you never see modern things like telephone poles and wires in pictures of Japan.  Sidewalks are nonexistent in most areas; everyone just walks in the street.  Storefronts come right up against the street, and the streets are incredibly narrow.  In Japan the storm sewers (suido) are separate from the sanitary sewers (gesui).  The storm sewers are semi-covered concrete troughs that form the sides of most streets in Japan.  The sanitary sewers are totally out of sight.  

Zoning is different in Japan, too.  Big cities like Tokyo and Osaka are really just a conglomeration of smaller neighborhoods, each with a small shopping street.  Nobody has to go very far to shop for groceries or anything else one might need for one's home.  The shops are mostly small, mom-and-pop specialty shops, with living quarters above the shop for the owner's family.  The streets are irregular, so from the train window, they look like they're all jumbled together.  

So where did I find the beautiful views?  I saw that beauty is mainly an inner thing.  Homes are as beautiful on the inside as they are ugly on the outside.  The older homes do have those big rooms that are mostly empty of furniture, but most modern homes are small and cluttered.  Gardens anywhere are so tiny that you have to take a close-up photo of them in order to eliminate the ugly surroundings.  The temples and shrines are there, all right, but they are few and far between in the big cities, unless you're in Kyoto or Kamakura.  (By the way, Kyoto and Kamakura were never fire-bombed by the Allies in World War II.  Even then, we knew what to leave alone, thank heaven.  But to be on the safe side, the Japanese totally emptied those cities of their art and historical treasures during the war years, including explicit plans for the rebuilding of  all the temples and shrines.)

There are women in kimono, but you don't see them except on special occasions. On New Year's Day many people dress in traditional garb to visit a Shinto Shrine to pray for good luck.  Coming of Age Day used to be held on January 15, but with the institution of the "Happy Monday system," the day is now celebrated on the second Monday in January.  On that day young people dress in their finest traditional kimono to attend ceremonies marking their formal entry into legal adulthood at the age of 20.  Apparently, the peak of attendance at these ceremonies was during the mid-1970s, when I first went to Japan.  These days, fewer than half of the "new adults" participate in the ceremonies, and most of them are actually 19, rather than exactly 20.  

Kimonos are also seen at weddings and funerals, and in the geisha district of Kyoto, Gion, which covers only a few blocks in the heart of the city.  (There used to be something like 80,000 geisha in Japan in the old days.  They were already pretty rare when I got there. Now there are maybe 2,000 traditional geisha, at the most.)  One other time people dress in kimono – actually cotton kimono called yukata – are the summer festivals of Tanabata (Star Festival) and O-Bon, which I will tell you about in a future post. 

I had a lot to learn about Japan, but the first lesson was something that it took me a while to process.  The Japanese tend to reserve their beautiful things for their inner spaces.  You see beautiful things behind a door or inside a fence.  You see beautiful things in corners and tucked inside small spaces.  You have to look carefully to find beauty. :-)

Friday, December 6, 2013

Awakening My Memories of Life in Japan

Today is Friday, December 6, 2013.

The other day I saw this little Japanese paper doll and recalled other little paper dolls that I have owned in the past.  They can be made with special patterned origami paper.  When I lived in Japan, I used to love to walk through the specialty stores where paper and fabrics were sold, just to appreciate all the beautiful patterns.  The image of the doll reminded me that I needed to finish preparations for a PowerPoint presentation I have agreed to give at the holiday gathering of the local MENSA group.

When I met some members of the local group last summer, they told me about last year's presentation, which had something to do with Chinese characters, and since I told them I'd spent ten years in Japan, they asked me if I could tell them something about Japanese.  I decided to talk about the hiragana syllabary writing and create a game for them to play.  I was hoping to find some five-yen coins to give as prizes, because the words go-en (five yen) sounds like the word goen, which means "good fortune."  Lots of Japanese carry around a little five-yen coin with a thread tied around it.  It's often attached to a keychain or, these days, even a necklace, and carried or worn for good luck.

Rooting around in my closet for the remnants of my life in Japan, I discovered that I didn't have enough go-en coins for prizes, but I had a whole pack of little cards, each one with a different ukiyoe woodblock print by Kitagawa Utamaro.  I also found some patterned origami paper.  I decided to fashion the paper into little envelopes and put one card into each envelope. 

As I fashioned the envelopes, I snapped some photos of my work and posted them on Facebook, which produced immediate responses from a couple of friends who have also been to Japan.   What followed was a very interesting discussion of some of our experiences in Japan, and a whole bunch of memories began to unfold.

I have a whole decade's worth of memories that I haven't written much about.  The other day I was writing about taking a front seat in life and fully accepting and enjoying one's experience.  It occurred to me that I was doing just that while I was in Japan.  That was a period in my life when I really did grab the tiger by the tail and give it a whirl.  Much of the rest of my life pales in comparison with my memories of life in Japan.

Every year, as we move through the month of December, I am aware that, in Japan, people are starting to prepare for year-end and new year celebrations.  The days just before and after New Year's Day in Japan are the most celebrated of all the days of the year, and I have many fond memories of my activities during this time of year.   

In the days ahead I will be writing about some of those memories.  :-) 

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Making Up Our Stories

Today is Thursday, December 5, 2013. 

Our minds are great at making up stories.  The trouble is that half the time they are not even true, yet we try and live our lives by them. 

The other day I wrote about being stuck in your story.  The idea was that our beliefs about ourselves create stories that provide a context for the events of our lives.  Our stories reside in our subconscious minds, along with other deeply-held beliefs.  In order to avoid a state of cognitive dissonance, our subconscious minds direct us to do whatever is necessary to ensure that our beliefs come true.  

How do our stories get started, anyway?  Our minds make them up!  Something happens and we make up a story about it.  Whatever we tell ourselves, the key is that it seems true at the time, whether or not it really is, and it is generally something that either makes us "look good" or it somehow justifies the actions that we took.  This self-storytelling happens when a powerful event takes place in our lives, and because the event is so powerful, the strong emotions that we feel tend to cement the story in our subconscious minds.  Occasionally the emotion is a positive one, and so the story is also positive, as long as it is rooted in reality.  Most of the time, though, the emotion is a negative one - embarrassment, deep grief, intense mental anguish, anger that turns into bitterness, worry that turns into anxiety, and so forth.  These emotions strengthen the negative stories that get filed in the subconscious, and these stories about ourselves stay with us from lifetime to lifetime. 

Why do some children seem inordinately fearful?  It's very likely because they have carried a story forward into this lifetime that says, "There is danger all around me."  If the child is afraid of heights or of the water, it may be a sign that he or she died from a fall or from drowning in a past life. The extreme fear felt in the last moments of life were carried forward into this life, in order to be processed and dealt with.

How does this work?  It's all about energy.  Everything is energy, and everything is vibrating at some frequency or other.  Our bodies vibrate at a particular frequency, and we as Soul also vibrate at a particular frequency.  That's our energy signature, also known as our state of consciousness.  Everything that happens to us affects our vibration; in particular, strong emotions lower our vibration, while strong positive emotions raise it.  Our vibration is the "point of contact" with the rest of the universe, and the means by which we attract people and events into our lives.

Think of the most traumatic memories of your current lifetime.  Remember that something that is traumatic to you may not seem so bad to someone else, but we're talking about you, now.  Whatever event you are thinking of, it was traumatic to you.  

Did you almost get run over by a car?  Did your house burn down?  Maybe you tried out for a sports team and didn't make the cut.  Maybe you tried to get into a certain university or you tried to get a certain job and failed.  Lots of people have had the experience of being dumped in a relationship, even left right at the altar.  Are you one of those?  Maybe you were so deeply embarrassed by something that happened that you had to move to another town.  Or as a child, perhaps you were cruelly teased by classmates for one reason or another.  Maybe you tried to have children and couldn't, or you were were raped and not allowed to have an abortion.  Perhaps you married the love of your life, only to realize later that he or she was an alcoholic, or abusive, or both.  Maybe you were abused by a parent or other adult in your family when you were a child.  Perhaps you got into a dangerous situation as a child: did you get locked in a dark closet or play in an abandoned refrigerator and get locked in?  Maybe you got fired from a job under unfavorable circumstances, or you were involved in a horrendous car accident.  Perhaps you were caught in the middle of a traumatic event such as an earthquake, a bank robbery, a hostage situation, or active battle conditions during your term of military service.  Maybe you survived a hurricane or tornado, a shooting event such as Sandy Hook or Columbine, or a plane crash.  

What have you come to believe about yourself as a result of these experiences?  How does this belief help you or hold you back?  Just about everybody has at least one limiting belief, or "story" about themselves.  If you can, find that story and change it. The mind created it, and the mind can change it.

And in the future, be constantly aware of your mind's propensity for creating stories.  Be as proactive as you can in creating positive, uplifting stories. :-)

 

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Climate Change Performance Index

Today is Wednesday, December 4, 2013.

Last month, the Climate Action Network Europe and Germanwatch, a public policy think tank, released their annual Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI), a report that assesses how individual countries are contributing to the global carbon problem, and how much they're trying to do about it.  Fifty-eight countries contribute 90 percent of the world's carbon emissions from fossil energy use.  Countries are ranked on the basis of their emissions trends, energy efficiency, progress on renewable energy, and overall climate policies. 

This year, the ranks of first, second and third were kept open, because no country has achieved the status of "good."  To quote from the report, "No single country is yet on track to prevent dangerous climate change.  Once again, the first three ranks of the CCPI remain open in this year's edition."  This means that when a country's rank is given, you have to subtract 3 from the number to get the actual rank among the 58 nations.

In the "good" category, the best performance was turned in by Denmark, whose rank is 4th because the first three ranks were left open.  Denmark's performance improved in all areas assessed.  The United Kingdom came in right after Denmark, with a decrease in emissions of 15% in the last five years, an improvement in energy efficiency, and an increased use of renewable energy.   In all, there were 12 nations who were ranked "good" on the report, including many European nations.

In the "moderate" category were 15 nations, including India, whose economy is booming.  India's rank was 30th, which would be 27th, if the first three ranks had not been left open.  The report noted that national experts in India had downgraded their own country, which meant a drop of 6 places compared with the previous year.  The CO2 emissions are increasing in India relatively quickly, and while the development of renewable energy is "good," it could be better, the report noted.  India still needs to catch up in the area of energy efficiency.


CCPI ranking and data for the ten largest
greenhouse gas emitting countries.
Source: CAN Europe/Germanwatch
The United States was ranked with 15 other nations included in the "poor" category.  Although the United States can be proud that it's greenhouse gas emissions have decreased by 8%, it's rank of 43rd remains unchanged from last year.  Accounting for the vacancies at the top, that means we came in 40th out of 58 nations. It was noted in the report that the U.S. climbed 12 places in terms of policies that we have put in place to curb CO2 emissions, and our "progress in the regulation of transportation and coal" was noted.  Also included in the "poor" category is China, whose rank was  46th, or in reality, 43rd out of 58 nations. No other details were given for China.

In the "very poor" category, there were 15 countries, including Australia, whose rank was 57th (54th), and Canada, who came in at 58th (55th).  The only countries whose performance was worse than Canada were the Islamic Republic of Iran, Kazakhstan, and Saudi Arabia, whose rank was dead last: 61st (58th).  

The report noted that Australia had lost ground, and cited the change in government there, as well as the "turnaround in installing a carbon levy and trade system."  The report said, "As in the previous year, Canada still shows no intention of moving forward with climate policy and therefore remains the worst performer of all industrialised countries."  

There was a panel discussion about the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline held recently in Georgetown, a neighborhood of Washington, D.C.,  which was livestreamed.  I listened for a few minutes to a woman who was talking about Canada's greenhouse gas emissions.  She said that there has been an increase in emissions of greenhouse gasses in Canada, which means a further increase in the gap between their actual emissions and their so-called "target."  If everything remained as it is today, there would still be an increase, but if the tar sands in the province of Alberta are mined and sent through the Keystone XL Pipeline, as proposed, Canada's emissions would increase dramatically, because the process of mining the stuff releases CO2 into the air.  The transport of the tar sands through the proposed pipeline would release some more – in the heartland of the United States – on its way to a refinery in Texas.  Once the tar sands are refined, the resulting fuel would be shipped to China.  The increase in emissions would be considerable, a fact that is generally not made clear to the public.  

So there you have it, folks.  Not very good news, is it?  :-/


Tuesday, December 3, 2013

What's Really Happening with CO2 Emissions

Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii
Today is Tuesday, December 3, 2013.

The other day, Adam Mordecai, a regular contributor to a site called Upworthy, shared some more information about CO2 emissions using graphs.  I already knew that CO2 emissions were increasing, so guys like Mordecai are preaching to the choir as far as I'm concerned.  As well, graphs are not always the most effective way to generate interest in a topic, and I was pretty sure I already knew what the graphs would show.  How many different ways are there to show "going up"? 

In the past couple of days, you may have noticed that I've posted some information about excessive consumerism and how it affects our environment.  It was while I was researching facts for yesterday's post that I came upon Mordecai's post, which was shared sometime after May 2013.  Since I was on a quest for facts, rather than entertainment, I decided to check out the post, anyway, and I'm glad I did.  I was shocked at what I learned.

Site of Mauna Loa Observatory on earth,
marked by a green star.
A bit of background, first.  Mordecai mentions the Keeling Curve.  If you've been following the whole discussion on Climate Change and Global Warming, you probably already know that CO2 emissions are monitored for the planet at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii.  These measurements were first taken under the supervision of Charles David Keeling (1928 - 2005), a scientist who specialized in geochemistry.  While studying geochemistry at Caltech, Keeling developed the first device to measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and was thus the first to discover that the amount of CO2 was rising.  The graph that plots the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is accordingly called the Keeling Curve, and it was this graph that first alerted people to the increasing amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere.  Keeling began to take measurements at the Mauna Loa Observatory in 1958.

The Mauna Loa Observatory is a perfect place to take these measurements, since it is located right at the top of the Mauna Loa volcano on the "big island" of Hawaii, a fairly remote location, where the air is mostly undisturbed, and influences of vegetation and human activity are at a minimum.  The observatory is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) - Global Monitoring Division (GMD).  

If you look at the data from 1958 to the present, it doesn't look that bad, and that's what a lot of people said when they saw it, because as we all know, earth is a very old planet, and we know that there are various cycles that have been going on for millennia.  However, within the last three decades, scientists have been able to take ice core samples in Antarctica from depths that allow us to measure the level of carbon dioxide in the air up to 800,000 years ago.  The ice core samples, taken at 0.55 m intervals, are crushed and measured under vacuum conditions.  The data from these ice core samples has been merged with modern data from the Mauna Loa Observatory to give us a longer-term view of what is happening now. 

As of October 2013, the amount of CO2 in the air has been pegged at 393.66 parts per million (ppm).  Data from the ice core samples shows that for the last 800,000 years, the levels of CO2 in the air have generally fluctuated between a low of 170 ppm, which occurred sometime between 660,000 and 670,000 years ago, and a high of 298.6 ppm around 330,000 years ago.  The levels were always at or below 260 ppm, otherwise.  

It has only been since industrial times that the CO2 level has risen so markedly.  Measurements in 2010 at Cape Grim in Tasmania (island off the southern coast of Australia) and at the South Pole both indicated values of 386 ppm.  It was estimated that the level of CO2 would increase about 2 ppm per year.  If the level was 386 ppm in 2010 and it only increased by 2 ppm per year, the level should only be 392 ppm now, but it's 393.66, which doesn't sound like much, but all indications are that the speed at which CO2 levels are rising is increasing.  That's not a good thing.  

Now let's look at the graphs.

In his post on Upworthy, Mordecai first showed a section of the Keeling Curve that covered only the past two years.  


There are both weekly averages (solid dots) and monthly averages (circles) plotted.  I should remind you, here, of what the term average means.  It means it's somewhere in the middle, between low temperatures and high temperatures collected from hundreds of locations around the globe.  There will always be low and high temperatures on earth. Places like Antarctica and Siberia will always be cold.  Places like Death Valley and the Amazon Rain Forest will always be hot.  The term "Global Warming" is misleading, because what's actually happening is that the average temperature around the globe is increasing.  This does not mean that cold places will suddenly become hot, nor does it mean that places that currently experience four distinct seasons will have an endless summer.  As you can see the average does go up and down with the seasons, but it continues to increase, with the average for May 2013 much higher than the average for May 2012, for example.  

OK, now let's take a look at the next graph.



Here's the trend over the last 55 years.  Pretty steady upward trend, you have to agree, with the expected ups and downs along the way.  This is what the Mauna Loa data shows, using the Keeling Curve, as measured between 1958 and the present time.

Now let's take a look at the merged data when you add in the information obtained from the ice core samples in Antarctica.  The data from the ice tell us that the lag-time between actual average temperature increases is only about 200 years.  Here's a graph of the CO2 data for the last 300 years. 



You have to realize, also that in this period of time, the Industrial Revolution occurred between about 1760 and 1840.  This was a period of transition from manufacturing things by hand to manufacturing them by machine.  In the years between 1840 and 1870, manufacturing gained momentum and machine tools were made on a large scale.  The Second Industrial Revolution occurred between 1870 and 1914.  In the United States, this was a time of unprecedented urbanization and a revolution in the transportation sector with the completion of the transcontinental railroad.  As we all know, 1914 marked the start of World War I, which kicked manufacturing into high gear.  With the 1940s came World War II, which was another boon to manufacturing.  In the graph above, you can see that carbon emissions seem to level off slightly after the war years, but look at what happens after the Mauna Loa data kicks in: a substantial increase.  


OK, let's look at the last 800,000 years to put modern times into perspective.  Although hominins (*not hominids - I'll explain in a minute) have existed for 6 0r 7 million years, "modern" humans have only existed within the last 200,000 years.  Specifically, one of the oldest human skulls ever found can be dated back 195,000 years, using dating of the surrounding volcanic ash to corroborate. Previous to this particular skull, the farthest back we could date human remains was about 150,000.  Since we have only one skull to go on, we could say that modern human beings have existed for approximately 150,000 years. 

(*The term hominids has recently been broadened within the scientific community to include not only humans both modern and extinct, but als0 chimanzees, gorillas, orang-utans and all their immediate ancestors.  If you want to refer to humans only, the term to use is "hominin.")  

As you can see from this last graph, there have been some really substantial periods of warming, in the last 800,000 years, but only one within our human existence. In pre-industrial times, the level was about 280 ppm, a little lower than the previous high of 298.6 ppm 330,000 years ago. 

The truly shocking thing is the exponential rise in CO2 emissions in the last 50,000 years or so.  There's been nothing even close to our present levels in 800,000 years!  

It's been estimated that in order to allow the earth's natural cycles to be able to cleanse the carbon from the atmosphere, the amount of CO2 in the air should not exceed 360 ppm.  At present, we are at an average of nearly 400 ppm, and daily readings of over 400 ppm were reached in May 2013, so the next average figure will be higher.

The actual average temperatures have gone up very slightly.  The problem is that an increase of only 2˚C or about 5.4˚F can be felt in the form of the superstorms that we are now experiencing, as well as overall warmer temperatures.  Think of your own body.  When your temperature is 98.6˚F, you are healthy.  If your body temp increases by only 2˚F, you have 100.6˚F, and you have a fever.  If it increases by just one more degree, you need to go to the hospital, pronto.  What makes you think the earth is any different?  :-(
chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans plus all their immediate ancestors) - See more at: http://australianmuseum.net.au/Hominid-and-hominin-whats-the-difference#sthash.6KC2eKsx.dpuf
chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans plus all their immediate ancestors) - See more at: http://australianmuseum.net.au/Hominid-and-hominin-whats-the-difference#sthash.6KC2eKsx.dpuf

Monday, December 2, 2013

More on Consumerism: The Story of Stuff

Today is Monday, December 2, 2013.

Sustainability the Musical on Facebook posted this Internet meme recently that says "99% of what's beneath a Christmas tree will be landfill within 6 months."   If you think this is an exaggeration, you need to watch the video called "The Story of Stuff," narrated by Annie Leonard, a proponent of sustainability and an aggressive critic of excessive consumerism.  In the film, she says she spent ten years studying the materials economy system, which has five phases: extraction, production, distribution, consumption, and disposal.  The system looks good on paper, until you read between the lines and look at what's not being taught in the economics textbooks.  As Leonard points out, this is a linear system, but our planet and its natural resources are finite.  You can't run a linear system indefinitely with finite resources. 

There's a lot of waste going on here in the United States, especially in the period of time between Thanksgiving and Christmas.   For one thing, our shopping orgy results in thousands of paper and plastic bags ending up in landfills.  And that's just our shopping bags.   When we get our purchases home, we wrap them up in gift wrap, all of which gets ripped off on or before Christmas morning. Once we dispense with the holiday wrapping paper, we still have to deal with the packaging: cellophane, plastics, cardboard and Styrofoam.  As Annie Leonard says, most of the products, themselves, get tossed out within six months.

And think of all those Christmas cards and letters that we send to friends and family.  Picture this: the 2.65 billion Christmas cards sold each year in the U.S. could fill a football field 10 stories high.  That's how much "stuff" ends up in landfills, and that's just greeting cards and year-end letters. 

If you have kids, some of the toys they get at Christmas require batteries.  In fact, a number of your adult toys require batteries, too. In the United States 40% of battery sales occur in the Thanksgiving-to-Christmas shopping period.  We all know what happens to batteries, don't we?

Then there's holiday food waste.  According to the USDA, Americans throw away 25% of all the food they buy.  That equals 52 billion pounds of food each year.  But wait, that's not the worst of it.  During the holiday season, between Thanksgiving and New Year's Day, our food waste triples, which means an extra 5 million tons of food in our landfills.  

Finally, we take down the Christmas tree.  Many of these also end up in landfills instead of being cut up and turned into mulch for gardens.  Sure, they're biodegradable, but they they will not be replaced within our lifetime.  Did you know that we have only 4% of our original forests left in the United States, and that globally, only 20% of the original forests are left?  Did you know that the Amazon Rain Forest loses 2,000 trees every minute - that's 7 football fields worth of trees.  Of course, your Christmas tree doesn't come from the Amazon Rain Forest, but the oxygen that you breathe does.  

What can you do about this?  

For one thing, even if you are in the habit of using cloth bags for your weekly grocery shopping, you probably leave the bags at home when you go holiday shopping.  This is when you really need those bags, and for large items, you will need large bags, which can be made at home out of canvas cloth. There's your autumn sewing project.

Scale down on the food you serve at parties and holiday dinners.  Make only as much as people will eat, or use all of the leftovers.  And find ways to get together with family and friends that don't necessarily involve food.

Start some new gift-giving traditions in your household and your extended family, or within your group of friends.  Challenge yourself to find creative ways to re-use or re-purpose items and give those recycled items as gifts.  Or instead of "things," give people the gift of your time and effort.  Arrange for a busy person on your gift list to receive a cooked meal at home from a delivery service, or better yet, make it and deliver it yourself.  Gift friends or relatives with a service such as a massage, a haircut, or a facial.  Give them an IOU to call in when they need a babysitter for a couple of hours while they get some errands done, or when they are just too tired to mow the lawn on the weekend.  The more gifts you give that don't have to be wrapped, the better.  If you have very young children, consider shelving some gifts and letting them open one gift at a time, over a period of weeks or even months.  

If you can, send holiday greetings and post holiday pictures online.  Consider not sending cards to people you communicate with often.  Explain that you're trying to save paper, and feel free to give them some of the statistics in this blog to reinforce your message.  Encourage people not to send you cards, either, especially if you correspond often.  These days, phone calls are cheap and video calls are easy to make online.  Consider including Grandma in a Skype session or video phone call.

About wrappings: find creative ways to use recycled materials as gift wrap.  According to the Use Less Stuff website, if every family in the U.S. used just re-used 2 feet of holiday ribbon, we could save 38,000 miles of ribben - that is enough to tie a bow around the entire planet!  If every American family wrapped just 3 presents in re-used materials, we could save enough paper to cover 45,000 football fields.  If we all bought just one less greeting card, we'd save 50,000 cubic yards of paper from going to the landfill.   

Don't get me wrong: there's nothing wrong with Christmas, but the excessive consumerism that goes on, especially around this particular holiday, is not OK.  Let's nip it in the bud, folks, before it comes back to bite us, big-time!  :-/

Sunday, December 1, 2013

All Paths Converge

Reconnaissance by Claude Gruffy
Source: ECKANKAR

Today is Sunday, December 1, 2013.

We may liken truth to a mountain, and various interpretations of that truth to different paths leading up to the summit.  Many people are traveling along all of these paths and every one, while he is at the bottom, thinks his path is the only one; he sees only a small part of the mountain, and may therefore be justified in crying to his brothers, "You are wrong! Come over to my path; this is the only one that leads to the top."  But as all these people progress upward, they will see that the paths converge at the top and that they are all one in the ultimate.  –Max Heindel

They say, "All roads lead to Rome." Perhaps the roads were built that way because humans were aware of a greater truth.

While we're driving along a highway, we can't see much more than about a mile ahead, and that is only if the road is straight and the air is clear.  We can see much more of the road from a higher vantage point, such as the top of a mountain, or from an airplane.  From space, if we had the right equipment, we could see even more of the road.  That's the kind of perspective God has, a 360˚ view to infinity.  

There is only one Creator, and it doesn't really matter, in the end, what you call IT, or what qualities or powers you ascribe to IT.  In fact, our understanding of God continues to grow as we move from moment to moment in our lives.  There are as many different religions as there are understandings of God.

It's not God that changes from religion to religion; it's only our own human concept of God that is different.  God is what IT is.  We are the ones who change.  Our perspectives and beliefs change, based on our experiences in life. We change as we mature in any given lifetime, and we change as we progress from one lifetime to the next.

Each perspective has something to offer, something to teach us.  We come into life on this planet time after time, and in each one, our understanding of God is a little different, until we have had a chance to experience all kinds of understandings.  Once this is done, we are better able to find points of agreement with people of other faiths, rather than dwell on the differences.

Many wars have been fought over religion, and there are still some conflicts going on today.  However, I do believe that as a whole, humanity is beginning to move away from warfare based on religious belief.  Ever so slowly, we are learning to tolerate, then accept, then learn from one another.  

A challenge: As we begin a new calendar year, let us find points of agreement between our own path and that of others.  Try to find at least five religions that are different from yours and find at least three things you can agree with.  If you are not religious, you may be surprised to find that there are probably a few points on which you can agree with members of one religion or another.  If you believe in God, you may be pleasantly surprised to find that you can even agree on some things with an atheist.  Give it a try.   :-)